I’ve been reading Ask
a Policeman – which I thought I’d read before but am now convinced that I
just thought I had. Possibly I conflated it with Six Against the Yard.
Either way, it’s a republished 1930s book by five or six members
of the ‘Detection Club’, a crime writers club founded in the 30s and still
going strong today (if anyone is curious about the club – which included A A
Milne, Dorothy Sayers, Christie and Chesterton as well as a number of fascinating
characters I’d never heard of – I can highly recommend The Golden Age of Murder by Martin Edwards).
In Ask a Policemen,
as with Scoop and The Floating Admiral - which I do
remember reading and reviewing - each writer takes a chapter of a murder
mystery. Unlike Admiral though, and
just to make it harder, each one also takes on the portrayal of another author’s
detective, and produces an alternative solution to the crime.
Since the crime is the shooting of a newspaper magnate
no-one, but no-one, is sorry to see dead - the kind whose papers print nothing
but negativity and scandal and bile, whose attitude to women is morally
dubious, and who bullies and throws tantrums at his staff – this is a purely
intellectual puzzle, and in fact, a bit of a romp.
The story begins with letters, or supposed letters, between
John Rhode and Milward Kennedy, deliberately breaking the fourth wall, there
are footnotes purportedly by Peter Wimsey, and others by Sayers commenting on
her fellow author Berkeley. Within the story itself a bishop, a cabinet
minister and an assistant commissioner of police all just happen to visit the
house on the morning in question without appointment, are admitted, and have
motives. Then the Home Secretary orders the police not to investigate, and gives the amateurs 48 hours to solve the crime.
It’s clearly meant to be a romp, a colossal in-joke
deliberately written for the amusement of their known audience, sending each
other up and flexing their literary muscles, deliberately breaking some of
their own rules, and as that it works extremely well and was great fun.
I did wonder how well it would work as a straight crime
novel for a non-aficionado though. I think, actually, it might be quite
confusing and off-putting to have this ridiculous set-up, and a change of
detective in each chapter, and every solution knocked down and superseded by
the next.
On the whole then great fun if you're familiar with the genre, but not a good place to start.
No comments:
Post a Comment